BALCHEM CORP filed this DEF 14A on April 26, 2024
BALCHEM CORP - DEF 14A - 20240426 - EXECUTIVE_COMPENSATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Consideration of 2023 Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Shareholder Engagement and Say-on-Pay Vote
We are committed to both listening and being responsive to our shareholders. The Compensation Committee carefully considers the results of the advisory vote on the approval of the compensation of our NEOs, commonly referred to as “Say-on-Pay”. Throughout the course of the year, we engage with shareholders in various ways as indicated below under “Shareholder Engagement Highlights.” In particular, during 2023 and early 2024, we actively reached out to our shareholders representing over 80% of outstanding shares in relation to executive compensation to help identify their views on our executive compensation programs and, where appropriate, implement changes.
Shareholder Engagement Highlights
Engaged with:
 Institutional investors
 Retail shareholders
 Pension funds
 Proxy advisory firms
 Industry associations
Engaged through:
 Quarterly earnings call
 Investor conferences
 Individual investor meetings
 Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders
 Sustainability Report
 Data verification process of proxy advisory firms
Engagements include:
 President, Chairman
and CEO
 CFO and Investor Relations
team
 Executive Officers
 Independent Directors
 Head of Global Sustainability
In 2023, engaged with shareholders representing:

Over 80% of total outstanding shares
or
Over 25.8 million shares
Information shared through:
 SEC filings including 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and Proxy Statement
 Quarterly earnings call
 Press releases
 Company website
 Media and digital platforms
During our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 72.3% of votes were cast in support of the compensation of our NEOs, compared to an average of approximately 95.9% support over the preceding five years. We believe this strong support in prior years is in recognition of our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy where the majority of executive compensation is tied to variable pay and payouts are aligned with the Company’s performance.
As part of our 2023 shareholder outreach efforts, we invited our largest 52 shareholders, representing over 80% of shares, to discuss their views on executive compensation, board diversity, and corporate social responsibility efforts, among other things. In June 2023, we held meetings with 13 of our largest shareholders representing over 40% of outstanding shares, including 7 of our 10 largest shareholders (“June 2023 Meetings”). Further, in January 2024, we reached out to our 10 largest shareholders (representing 56% of outstanding shares) and held meetings with four of them (representing 28.8% of outstanding shares) to receive feedback on updates related to our governance and remuneration practices (“January 2024 Meetings”).
Participants in the June 2023 Meetings consisted of our Lead Director and Chair of the Compensation Committee, the former Lead Director and Chair of the Compensation Committee, our Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, and Chief Human Resources Officer, with slight variance depending on schedules. Participants in the January 2024 Meetings consisted of our Lead Director and Chair of the Compensation Committee, our Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, Chief Human Resources Officer, Head of Global Sustainability, and Director of Investor Relations, with slight variance depending on schedules.
During the June 2023 Meetings, we mainly sought to receive feedback and views in relation to the additional definitive proxy solicitation materials that were filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 12, 2023 (“2023 Additional Proxy Materials”). The Additional Proxy Materials provided a detailed description and explanation of the one-time stock option retention grant that was provided in September 2022 (“2022 Retention Grant”) to Ted Harris, our Chairman, President and CEO. As explained in the 2023 Additional Proxy Materials, the Compensation Committee believed the 2022 Retention Grant was
35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
necessary to retain the services of Mr. Harris and was consistent with the Company’s retention strategy and pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. Further, the 2022 Retention Grant, which was structured in four tranches with increasing exercise prices and with the first 25% vesting only upon the third anniversary of the grant date, was intended to further drive the financial performance of the Company to the benefit of our shareholders as a whole.
During the June 2023 and January 2024 Meetings, our shareholders expressed a preference for addressing retention matters as part of the Company’s existing remuneration program instead of through a one-time retention grant. They understood the rationale behind the 2022 Retention Grant, expressed robust support for Mr. Harris’ leadership as CEO, which drove the Company’s growth and strong financial performance over the last 8 years, and recognized the need to retain his services. Further, we received positive feedback indicating strong support for the structure of the Company’s existing remuneration program and its alignment with the Company’s pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. This feedback was consistent with the very strong support (approval ratings in the mid-to-high nineties) for Say-On-Pay that the Company has received in prior years.
We have made the following clarifications and changes to our executive compensation in response to shareholder feedback:
The Compensation Committee does not expect to make one-time equity awards to executive officers, absent extraordinary circumstances, such as in connection with new hires or promotions. This is consistent with not otherwise having a history of granting one-time retention awards to executive officers.
In October 2023, the Compensation Committee selected Pearl Meyer as its new independent compensation consultant. Pearl Meyer is a leading independent executive and board compensation consulting firm.
In December 2023, the Compensation Committee completed a review and update of Balchem’s executive compensation peer group, which will be used for benchmarking purposes in 2024.
The Company has enhanced its disclosure of the performance achievement metrics (TSR and EBITDA) for the Company’s 2021-2023 performance share grant cycle.
The Company communicates regularly with shareholders on various matters, including executive compensation, and seeks to incorporate shareholder input into its executive compensation practices. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider shareholder feedback and evolving best practices in making compensation decisions in future years and will continuously endeavor to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with those of our shareholders and support long-term value creation.
Awards Under Incentive Plan
In addition, and driven in part by our efforts to maintain best practices in executive compensation, the following features are included in the Amended and Restated Balchem Corporation 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Amended 2017 Plan”):
Limitation on Shares: The maximum number of shares which may be issued under the Amended 2017 Plan is 2,400,000 shares;
No Repricing of Stock Options or SARs: No repricing (or amendments or replacements related to a repricing) of outstanding Stock Options/SARs is allowed without shareholder approval;
No Discounted Awards: The exercise price per share of stock under a Stock Option or SAR award must be not less than the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant;
Minimum Vesting: Except for 5% of the shares authorized for grant under the Amended 2017 Plan and other limited exceptions, awards (other than cash performance awards) are generally subject to a minimum vesting period of one year;
Dividends or Dividend Equivalents: Dividends or dividend equivalents otherwise payable on an unvested award will accrue and be paid only when the vesting conditions applicable to the underlying award have been satisfied;
No Liberal Share Recycling: Recycling of shares used to satisfy the exercise price or taxes for any awards is prohibited;
36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
No Liberal Change in Control: The consummation of a merger or similar transaction and a minimum acquisition of 50% of the outstanding shares is required before a change-in-control occurs;
No Automatic “Single-Trigger” Vesting on Change in Control: There is no automatic acceleration of any outstanding awards upon the occurrence of a change in control;
Limitations on Awards to Non-Employee Directors: In the case of awards to non-employee directors, the maximum amount or value that may be granted in any calendar year (inclusive of cash compensation) may not exceed $800,000; and
Compensation Recovery: In the event that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement of its financial statements due to the Company’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws, the Compensation Committee would have the discretion to require reimbursement or forfeiture of certain excess performance-based awards received by certain executive officers of the Company during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement.
Full Year 2023 Financial Summary

Note: GAAP Net Earnings were $108.5 million for FY 2023 and $105.4 million for FY 2022. Please refer to the reconciliation of the above non-GAAP financial measures (Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Earnings, and Adjusted Earnings Per Share) to the comparable GAAP financial measures in Appendix A beginning on page A-1 of this proxy statement.
Compensation Committee Methodology
NEOs Other than the CEO:
The CEO recommends to the Compensation Committee the amount of total annual compensation for each of the other NEOs.
The CEO completes an annual performance assessment for each of the other NEOs, which is reviewed and considered by the Compensation Committee.
The CEO:
The Compensation Committee conducts an annual performance appraisal of the CEO using evaluation information solicited from each independent Board member and recommends to the Board the annual compensation package for the CEO.
In determining the compensation of the Company’s NEOs for 2023, the Compensation Committee considered many quantitative and qualitative performance factors, including the financial performance of the Company, return on equity, cash flow, return on assets, growth, management of assets, liabilities, capital, liquidity and risk. The Compensation Committee also considered intangible factors such as the scope of responsibility of the NEO leadership within the Company, the community, the applicable industries in which the Company operates and the enhancement of shareholder value.
37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
When establishing performance criteria for each of the NEOs and for the management team as a group, the Compensation Committee endeavors to balance short-term and long-term performance of the Company and cumulative shareholder value.
All factors are considered in the context of the market for Balchem’s products and services, and the complexity and difficulty of managing business risks in the prevailing economic conditions and regulatory environment.
The Compensation Committee believes that the total compensation provided to the NEOs is competitive and has been demonstrated as effective. Details regarding the NEO compensation are set forth in the tables that follow.
Compensation Consultants
The Compensation Committee has authority to engage attorneys, accountants and consultants, including executive compensation consultants, to solicit input concerning compensation matters, and to delegate any of its responsibilities to one or more directors or members of management, where it deems such delegation appropriate and permitted under applicable law.
To better understand the compensation practices of similar companies, the Compensation Committee from time to time, reviews data gathered from a custom peer group. In late 2023, the Compensation Committee, upon close consultation with Pearl Meyer, completed a review and update of Balchem’s peer group. Peer group information serves as the primary reference point for the Compensation Committee with Mercer market survey data used as a secondary reference.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2023 Peer Group Companies
The following companies comprised our peer group for 2023:
American Vanguard Corp.
H.B. Fuller Co.
NewMarket Corp.
Ashland Global Corp.
Hain Celestial Group
Phibro Animal Health Corp.
Cabot Corp.
Ingevity Corp.
Quaker Chemical Corp.
Chase Corp.
Innospec Inc.
Sensient Technologies
Element Solutions
J&J Snack Foods Corp.
The Simply Good Foods Co.
Ferro Corp.
Kraton Corp.
Stepan Co.
FMC Corp.
Lancaster Colony Corp.
Tootsie Roll Industries
FutureFuel Corp.
Minerals Technologies
 
This peer group was developed based on comparability to the Company in terms of industry and size, with data gathered from peer group proxy statements. We intend to continue to retain outside compensation consultants that will provide benchmarking data. Based on input from Pearl Meyer, the peer group was refreshed in December 2023 and a new group of peers, which includes many of the companies identified above plus certain new peers, will be used for benchmarking purposes in 2024.
Benchmarks
While compensation survey data and benchmarking are useful guides for comparative purposes, we believe that a successful compensation program also requires the application of judgment and subjective determinations, particularly with respect to individual performance. Accordingly, our Compensation Committee applies its judgment to adjust and align each individual element of our compensation program with the broader objectives of the program. For example, we consider other factors, including, but not limited to, the Company’s historical compensation trends; recommendations of the CEO; the performance of the Company, its operating units and their respective executives; market factors such as the health of the economy and of the industries served by the Company; the availability of executive talent; executives’ length of service; and internal assessments and recommendations regarding particular executives.
Base Salary
Base salary is the fixed component of pay based on each NEO’s job responsibilities, performance and competitive benchmark data. Annual incentive cash bonuses and long-term compensation also are based on a percentage of base salary.
38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
To ensure we attract and retain the leadership talent required to successfully lead the Company, NEO base salaries are targeted to be competitive with base salary compensation paid to peer group NEOs and other relevant external benchmarks derived from established market survey information.
In establishing NEO base salaries, the Compensation Committee also considers:
experience and industry knowledge;
the quality and effectiveness of their leadership;
performance relative to total compensation;
internal pay equity among the NEOs and other Company senior executives;
historical considerations;
retention factors; and
input from our CEO regarding individual performance.
NEO base salaries are reviewed annually and may be adjusted to recognize individual performance, promotions, competitive compensation levels, retention requirements, internal pay equity, overall budgetary considerations and other qualitative factors.
Cash Based Incentives – Incentive Compensation Plan
Balchem’s Incentive Compensation Plan (“ICP”) represents a variable, at-risk, cash-based component of each NEO’s compensation. The Company’s policy is to base a meaningful portion of NEO cash compensation on variable incentive opportunities that drives year-over-year financial performance to align NEO compensation opportunities directly with Company financial performance.
ICP awards are based on two financial metrics:
Company Adjusted EBITDA (defined as earnings before interest, other expense/income, taxes, depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, acquisition-related expenses and legal settlements, and the fair valuation of acquired inventory); and,
Free Cash Flow (defined as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures).
Unless the Compensation Committee in its discretion determines otherwise, no ICP awards are payable unless the Company attains the Compensation Committee-approved threshold minimum of Adjusted EBITDA.
Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow are financial measures that are not in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The Company believes that the use of these measures in the executive compensation context is helpful in evaluating and comparing our past financial performance with our future results.
These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP; however, the Company believes that they provide useful information about certain of the Company’s core operating results and thus are appropriate to enhance the overall understanding of the Company’s past financial performance and its prospects for the future in the context of evaluating the performance of our executive officers.
As part of the 2022 ICP design and onwards, the Compensation Committee approved the inclusion of an ESG component in the ICP structure for senior management in the form of an ESG modifier of +/- 10% in an effort to drive accountability in advancing progress towards our ESG goals, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by 2030 (from a 2020 baseline) and reducing water withdrawal by 25% by 2030 (from a 2020 baseline). Achieving progress toward these strategic targets is a baseline expectation and the enhancement or reduction of the ICP will only be for achievement well above or below overall expected progress towards our ESG goals. Regardless of ESG performance, the maximum payout for ICP is 200% of target. Upon review by the Compensation Committee, the ESG modifier amount was 0% for 2023, considering the Company’s overall progress on ESG initiatives is in line with expectations.
The Compensation Committee may in its discretion approve cash-based bonuses when ICP goals are not met, if it believes there has nevertheless been exceptional segment or individual performance. No such discretionary bonuses were approved by the Compensation Committee in 2023. The Compensation
39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Committee may also approve at its discretion ICP or discretionary cash-based awards at other times during the year in connection with new appointments or promotions. Our Compensation Committee does not time the issuance of incentive awards around our release of undisclosed material information.
ICP target amounts for each NEO are expressed as a percentage of actual base salary earned during the applicable calendar year. For 2023, NEO ICP targets were:
NEO
ICP Target as a Percent of Base Salary
Ted Harris
110%
C. Martin Bengtsson
65%
Frederic Boned
50%
Hatsuki Miyata
50%
Martin Reid
50%
For the 2023 plan year, the Compensation Committee established the Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow performance weighting and metrics as follows:
Metric
Weighting
Threshold
Target
Stretch
Maximum
Adjusted EBITDA
70%
$216.1
$244.9
$257.1
269.4
Free Cash Flow
30%
$115.4
$135.8
$142.6
$149.4
ESG Modifier for Executive Officers
+/- 10%
2023 ICP Discussion
On February 7, 2024, the Compensation Committee, following its review of the Company’s 2023 financial results, noted that the Company had achieved the following results:
Metric
2023 Result
Actual vs. Target
Payout Percentage
Adjusted EBITDA
$230.9 million
94.3%
51.5%
Free Cash Flow
$151.1 million
111.3%
200%
Based on the resulting Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow results, the Compensation Committee, approved the aggregate ICP payout level at 96.0% of target. With respect to the ESG modifier, the Compensation Committee recognized that good progress was made in 2023 and was aligned with expectations. The modifier is intended to apply only to achievement that is well above or below overall expected progress. Therefore, the Compensation Committee did not modify the 2023 ICP payout up or down based on progress made towards ESG goals during the year.
For additional detail on the ICP, see “Summary Compensation Table – Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”
Equity Based Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”)
Our NEOs have significant responsibility for the management, growth and long-term success of the Company. Consequently, the Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of their compensation be a variable, at-risk equity component that is aligned with the creation over time of value for shareholders and stakeholders while supporting critical retention and key leadership development efforts.
40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
LTIP Awards –
The Compensation Committee establishes each NEO’s “Target Equity Multiplier,” which is multiplied by the NEOs’ base salary to determine the “Target Equity Value” and expressed as the dollar value of the LTIP award. The Target Equity Multiplier for each NEO is shown below:
NEO
Target Equity
Multiplier
(of Base Salary)
Ted Harris
3.00
C. Martin Bengtsson
1.75
Frederic Boned
1.00
Hatsuki Miyata
1.00
Martin Reid
1.00
The Target Equity Value is then converted into equity awards based upon the fair value on the date LTIP awards are granted, usually in February of each calendar year, as computed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718.
Although the Compensation Committee approves the LTIP equity in this time frame, it also reviews competitive market data for NEOs from time to time. The Compensation Committee may grant LTIP awards at other times during the year because of new appointments, promotions or other special circumstances. Our Compensation Committee does not time the grants of incentive awards around our release of undisclosed material information. The Compensation Committee may in its discretion adjust individual grants based upon individual performance.
The Target Equity Value is granted through a mix of stock options (“Stock Options”), time-based restricted shares (“Time-Based Restricted Shares”) and Performance Shares (as defined below) as follows:
25% of the 2023 Target Equity Value is awarded as Stock Options with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant. Stock Options have a ten-year term and vest 20% after Year 1, 40% after Year 2 and 40% after Year 3.
25% of the 2023 Target Equity Value is awarded as Time-Based Restricted Shares which are granted at the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant and cliff vest three (3) years from said date.
25% of the 2023 Target Equity Value is awarded as EBITDA performance shares (“EBITDA Performance Shares”). The number of EBITDA Performance Shares that will vest (or not vest) is based upon the attainment of a pre-determined Company EBITDA performance target over the three (3) fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year in which the grant was made (“Performance Period”). The EBITDA Performance Shares will vest (or not vest) at the end of the Performance Period.
25% of the 2023 Target Equity Value is awarded as Total Shareholder Return performance shares (the “TSR Performance Shares” and collectively with the EBITDA Performance Shares, the “Performance Shares”). The number of TSR Performance Shares that will vest (or not vest) is based upon the relative Company TSR vs. the Russell 2000 Index over the three (3) fiscal years beginning with Performance Period.
The 2023-2025 Performance Period will conclude at the end of fiscal 2025 and the awards will pay out, to the extent earned, in shares of common stock in February 2026.
41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2021 Performance Share Payout Discussion
On February 7, 2024, the Compensation Committee, following its review of the Company’s EBITDA and TSR performance from the 2021-2023 Performance Period, approved the following payout for the 2021 Performance Share grant:
2021 PSU GRANTS EBITDA
(50% Weight)
2020 FY EBITDA
2023 FY EBITDA
Actual EBITDA
Growth
(2021-2023)
Threshold
EBITDA Growth
(50% of Target Payout)
Target
EBITDA Growth
(100% of Target Payout)
Maximum
EBITDA Growth
(200% of Target Payout)
EBITDA Payout
as a % of Target
$162.1
$213.8
31.8%
10.0%
24.2%
31.5%
200.0%
2021 PSU GRANTS - Relative TSR
(50% Weight)
Balchem TSR
Russell 2000
25th %'ile
(50% of Target Payout)
Russell 2000
50th %'ile
(100% of Target Payout)
Russell 2000
75th %'ile
(200% of Target Payout)
Balchem
%'ile Rank
TSR Payout
% of Target
23.8%
-50.4%
2.0%
46.5%
63.5
153.9%
In aggregate, the 2021-23 Performance Shares (PSUs) vested in 178.5% of the target units originally granted.
Stock Ownership Requirements; Trading Limitations
The Company has formal stock ownership requirements for its directors and executive officers. The requirements under the Company’s Stock Ownership Policy for Directors and Executive Officers are:
Director/Officer
Ownership Requirement
(Value of Common Stock)
Directors
5x multiple of annual cash retainer
CEO
3x multiple of annual base salary
Chief Financial Officer
1.5x multiple of annual base salary
All Other Executive Officers
1x multiple of annual base salary
Both directors and executive officers have five years from the date of hire or commencement of service as a director, as applicable, to attain the required level of ownership. The number of shares to be held will be calculated at the end of each fiscal year based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq as of December 31 of each calendar year and submitted to the Governance Committee for review. Once the holding requirement is met, any subsequent change in the value of the shares will not affect the amount of stock that executive officers or directors should hold. In the event an executive officer’s annual base salary is increased or a director’s annual cash retainer is increased, such officer or directors will have five years from the time of increase to acquire any additional shares needed to meet the requirements under the stock ownership policy. Further, executive officers who are subsequently promoted to a higher officer level will have five years from the date of promotion to acquire any additional shares needed to meet this policy.
For purposes of the stock ownership requirement, the following are included:
value of shares owned separately or owned jointly with, or separately by, immediate family members residing in the same household;
value of shares held in trust for the benefit of the Executive Officer or Director and immediate family members;
42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
value of shares purchased on the open market;
value of shares acquired and held by an Executive Officer through the Company’s 401(k) plan;
value of shares obtained through stock option exercise (and not thereafter sold); and
value of shares of restricted stock or performance shares, which have vested free and clear of restrictive legends.
Stock ownership does not include unexercised stock options, stock appreciation rights, or the non-vested portion of any stock options, restricted stock or performance awards.
Pursuant to the stock ownership policy, the Governance Committee may, at its discretion, waive the stock ownership requirement if compliance would create an undue hardship or prevent an Executive Officer or Director from complying with a court order. In such instances, the Governance Committee may make a decision to develop an alternative stock ownership program for such executive officer or director that reflects the intention of the policy and give appropriate consideration of his/her personal circumstances.
All directors and officers are currently in compliance with our stock ownership policy.
Clawback Policy
In 2023, the Company formally adopted an Incentive-Based Compensation Recovery Policy, or clawback policy, pursuant to which the Company can seek reimbursement of either cash or equity-based incentive compensation in the event of a financial restatement due to the Company’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws. This policy, which applies to current and former executive officers, applies broadly to incentive-based compensation, including:
(i)
non-equity incentive plan awards that are earned solely or in part by satisfying a financial reporting measure performance goal;
(ii)
bonuses paid from a bonus pool, where the size of the pool is determined solely or in part by satisfying a financial reporting measure performance goal;
(iii)
other cash awards based on satisfaction of a financial reporting measure performance goal;
(iv)
restricted stock, stock options and performance share units that are granted or vest solely or in part on satisfying a financial reporting measure performance goal; and
(v)
proceeds from the sale of shares acquired through an incentive plan that were granted or vested solely or in part on satisfying a financial reporting measure performance goal.
The amount of erroneously awarded compensation to be recovered will be the amount of incentive-based compensation received that exceeds the amount of incentive-based compensation that otherwise would have been received had it been determined based on the restated amounts, and must be computed without regard to any taxes paid. Any right of recoupment under the Company’s clawback policy is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies or rights of recoupment that may be available to the Company pursuant to the terms of any similar policy in any compensatory or incentive plan, employment agreement, equity award agreement, or similar plan or agreement and any other legal remedies available to the Company. The Company may not indemnify any such executive officer against the loss of such recovered compensation.
Employment Agreements
The Company has employment agreements with Mr. Harris and has entered into the Bengtsson Offer Letter, which are described below under the section of this proxy statement titled “Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.” Other than such agreements, there are no agreements or understandings between the Company and any NEO that guarantee continued employment or any level of compensation, including incentive or bonus payments. The Company does not have a written policy regarding employment agreements. There is no provision in foregoing agreements or in any employment or other arrangement with any other executive officer whereby any tax gross-up payment to cover any excise taxes on excess parachute payments will be made.
Balchem Corporation 401(k) Plan
The Company sponsors the 401(k) Plan for eligible employees, including NEOs. The Company provides a fully vested match in company stock that is equal to 100% of participant contributions up to 6% of eligible compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Service guidelines. Such share purchases are handled through the plan administrator in the open market and no shares are issued by the company for purposes of the company match under the 401(k) Plan.
43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The amount of the Company’s contribution to the 401(k) Plan for each NEO is shown in a footnote to the “All Other Compensation” section of the Summary Compensation Table.
Perquisites
Perquisites are granted to the NEOs occasionally and are not a material component of compensation. Mr. Harris is entitled to the use of an automobile owned or leased by the Company and to be reimbursed for a specified level of premiums for life and disability insurance. He is also entitled to the use of a financial planner. The Company pays to insure and maintain Mr. Harris’ automobile, and reimburses Mr. Harris for auto expenses that are related to Company business. Mr. Bengtsson, Mr. Boned, Ms. Miyata, and Mr. Reid receive or received cash allowances associated with the use of their personal automobiles. Perquisites for each NEO are shown in the “All Other Compensation” section of the Summary Compensation Table.
Balchem Deferred Compensation Plan
Balchem offers a voluntary, non-qualified deferred compensation plan (“Deferred Compensation Plan”) for NEOs and select other executives. The Deferred Compensation Plan allows participants to defer up to 75% of annual base salary and up to 100% of annual ICP bonus. Compensation deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan is deemed invested by the participant among various mutual fund investment options. Earnings (or losses) on investments are market earnings (or losses). The Deferred Compensation Plan is not formally funded nor does the Company guarantee any rate of return. The Company does not match any deferral contributions. Distributions may be in a lump sum or installments as determined by the participant’s distribution election.
Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Program
Our Compensation Committee has discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation program and does not believe our compensation program encourages excessive or inappropriate risk-taking for the following reasons:
Our compensation consists of both fixed and variable components.

The fixed (or salary) portion of compensation is designed to provide a steady income regardless of our stock price performance so that executives do not feel pressured to focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business aspects.

The variable portions of compensation (cash bonus and equity) are designed to reward both short- and long-term corporate performance.
For short-term performance, our cash bonus is awarded based primarily on corporate and business segment performance goals or targets.
For long-term performance, our Stock Options generally vest ratably over three years and are only valuable if our stock price increases over time. Our Time-Based Restricted Share grants and Performance Share grants generally cliff vest in three years.
The variable elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage of overall compensation to motivate executives to produce superior short- and long-term corporate results, while the fixed element is also sufficient such that executives are not encouraged to take unnecessary or excessive risks in doing so.
The use of Adjusted EBITDA as the contingent factor upon which ICP cash incentive depends, encourages our executives to take a balanced approach that focuses on corporate profitability, rather than other measures such as revenue targets, which may create incentives for management to drive sales without regard to cost structure. No payout is made under the ICP program if we are not sufficiently profitable.
Our ICP and LTIP awards are capped for each participant, which mitigates excessive risk-taking. Even if the Company dramatically exceeds its Adjusted EBITDA target, the awards are limited. Conversely, there is no ICP or LTIP award unless minimum performance levels of applicable goals are achieved.
Because a portion of management’s personal investment portfolio consists of the Company’s stock, we believe that the stock ownership guidelines we have in place provide a considerable incentive for management to consider the Company’s long-term interests in both their short- and long-term decisions. In addition, we prohibit all hedging transactions involving our stock, so our executives and directors cannot insulate themselves from the effects of poor Company stock price performance.
44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following table sets forth fixed and variable components as a percentage of total compensation, as presented in the “Total” column of the “Summary Compensation Table for 2023,” that we paid for the year ended December 31, 2023, to each NEO.
Name
Fixed Component of
Compensation
Variable Component of
Compensation
Ted Harris
20.4%
79.6%
C. Martin Bengtsson
31.3%
68.7%
Frederic Boned
40.7%
59.3%
Hatsuki Miyata
43.1%
56.9%
Martin Reid
42.1%
57.9%
Compensation Committee Report
We have reviewed and discussed the above “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management.
Based upon this review and discussion, we have recommended to the Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Matthew Wineinger (Chair)
David Fischer
Kathleen Fish
Daniel Knutson
45