The Governance Committee typically engages a professional search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates. The Company may also consider candidates recommended by one or more substantial, long-term shareholders. Generally, shareholders that individually or as a group hold 5% or more of our Common Stock for more than one year will be considered substantial, long-term shareholders. To be considered by the Governance Committee, the nomination must comply with Article II, Section 6 of our Bylaws and be properly submitted to the Secretary of the Company by the deadline for including shareholder proposals as set forth on page
70 in “Shareholder Proposals for 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.” Shareholder nominations that comply with these procedures and meet the criteria outlined above and in our Bylaws will receive the same consideration as other candidates.
The Governance Committee considers the following criteria when evaluating candidates:
(1)
| have experience and skills in areas critical to understanding the Company and its business; |
(2)
| possess certain personal characteristics, such as integrity and judgment; |
(3)
| have a diverse background of experience and perspectives (including business experience, geographic origin, age, gender, and ethnicity); and |
(4)
| have sufficient ability to commit the necessary time and effort required to serve on the Board. |
Members of the Governance Committee (and/or the Board) also meet personally with each candidate to evaluate the candidate’s ability to work effectively with other members of the Board, while also exercising independent judgment. The Board believes that diversity within a Board promotes the inclusion of different perspectives and ideas and ensures that the Company benefits from all available talent. Therefore, the Board evaluates each candidate in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending an individual that can best contribute to perpetuate the success of the Company and represent shareholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment based upon a diversity of background, experience and perspectives.
As noted above, the Board seeks to identify a diverse talent pool of highly qualified candidates for consideration as part of board refreshment. We believe that Board membership should reflect diversity in its broadest sense and that diversity within a Board promotes the inclusion of different perspectives and ideas, mitigates against groupthink and ensures that the Company has the opportunity to benefit from all available talent. We also seek to combine the skills and experience of our long-standing Board members with fresh perspectives, insights, skills and experiences of new members.
In selecting and assessing potential Board candidates, the Board, with the support of the Governance Committee, takes into consideration a broad range of factors such as skills, expertise, breadth of experience, understanding of business and financial issues, ability to exercise sound judgment, leadership, achievements and experience in matters affecting business and industry, board experience and viewpoints, including a candidate’s gender, race, ethnicity, geography and other factors that would complement the existing Board and contribute to enhancing the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions, recognizing that our businesses and operations are diverse and global in nature.
The Board is comprised of 7 members, two of whom are women (28.5% gender diversity). Gender diversity for the Board was at 37.5% until mid-October of 2024 when the Governance Committee accepted the resignation of Ms. Lee as a Director. See page
18 of this Proxy Statement for board composition pie charts with information regarding board independence, board tenure, and board age range.
During 2024: (i) the Board held five meetings; (ii) the Audit Committee held seven meetings; (iii) the Compensation Committee held three meetings; (iv) the Governance Committee held four meetings (three regular meetings and one special meeting); and (v) the Executive Committee did not meet.
Each of our directors demonstrates their strong engagement, has adequate time to devote to Board matters, and has high attendance. During 2024, all directors attended, on average, 97.4% of Board meetings and 94.3% of all Committee meetings on which they served during that year. Only two directors attended less than 100% (but at least 75%) of all meetings.